Jim and Beth took the decision to have their home tested for any possible asbestos contamination a number of years ago. They had purchased the home in fulfilment of a promise to their God and as they were going through the process of buying their new home, they were getting worried about what the future might bring. So they did their research on asbestos testing in Manukau and they found out that they weren’t alone; there were many other families in the region that had just discovered the same thing. The results of that research were two very strong words; “bestos testing in Manukau”.
Jim was determined to have nothing to do with it; he had done his research and nothing could be further from the truth. He called up his trusted Manukau building inspector who explained to him what the problem was and that is the fact that asbestos is not only present in the soils of Manukau, it is also present in all the other minerals present in the soil. So there was no way that he could say that the asbestos wasn’t there. They then moved onto talking about the implications of what the testing would uncover. It was obvious that they were both at odds with each other and couldn’t see eye to eye on the subject; the building inspector would always arrive at a different conclusion than the homeowner while the former was always more sceptical.
I listened to all of the information that they had to share but I didn’t buy into any of it. What struck me as odd though was the fact that the testers had said that the tests that they had conducted were not comprehensive enough to show that asbestos was present. Jim knew that the tests needed to be more comprehensive than they were but they were never able to convince him otherwise. After all he had bought his house just months before the test results came back and found none of the three components that they had suspected existed. The association conducts random sampling during a number of projects. For Jim, this meant that he could have his asbestos testing in Manukau done by qualified professional.
Then one day, just after the home refurbishments were complete, Jim received an email from one of the accountants. The subject line was ‘A friend called and told me about the asbestos’. Jim’s first reaction was to tell the accountant that he hadn’t known about the asbestos in his home. Jim was disappointed that nobody had mentioned this to him before but when he read through the report, he suddenly understood what had occurred. The asbestos had been removed. Jim knew that his home was safe again but the accounting report surprised him. One of the most cost effective ways to deal with a contaminated home is to have the asbestos testing in Manukau done and have it cleaned up by a certified asbestos removal company.
There was one section in particular where the levels of asbestos were so high, the sample could not be used for another test. Jim didn’t think too much of it until one of the following happened. A few weeks later, he noticed that one of his fire extinguishers had some asbestos residue on its lining. Jim contacted the fire station and was told that they did not deal with asbestos or with samples of it. Jim asked if he could have the unit tested.
The one problem with having your test done by a qualified person is that they will need to get samples from all sections of the house. One good rule of thumb is to always have one third of one room and one third of the other rooms tested. If you don’t, there will be a lot of guesswork involved in trying to determine which samples come up positive. The professionals can look at the test results and give you an answer of whether or not your home is contaminated with asbestos.
So, what is the best way to deal with asbestos testing in Manukau? Well, if you live in an area that is known to have high levels of asbestos then you should contact an asbestos surveying company. There are many companies available in Manukau that have the experience and knowledge to help you with removing asbestos safely like Jim’s Building Inspections.